Muse Ember
Meta’s smallest and most efficient Muse model, built for complex reasoning and the work agents repeat all day: tool calls, coding subtasks and routing, with a 1M-token multimodal context window.
- Text
- Image
- Audio
- Video
- Minimal
- Low
- Medium
- High
- xHigh
Mass Intelligence Is Not Wisdom
When a billion people have access to advanced AI, we do not get a billion geniuses. We get a billion people who never have to live with the consequences of being wrong — and that is far more dangerous.
My strong opinion: Mass Intelligence will not elevate humanity. It will split it.
Most people will use AI to outsource thinking and call the result their own. They will write better essays, make better decisions, and seem smarter, while quietly atrophying the only muscle that matters: judgment. AI gives you fluent confidence on demand. If you lean on it without earning your own, you do not become intelligent. You become a passenger who thinks he is a pilot. The smartphone did this to memory. AI will do it to reasoning.
The winners will be the opposite: a minority who use AI as a brutally honest sparring partner. They will ask it to attack their best ideas, find their blind spots, and prove them wrong. They will check, test in the real world, and take responsibility when it fails. In the era of Mass Intelligence, the scarce human skill is not generating answers. Anybody can generate answers now. It is knowing which answer to distrust.
That means the old hierarchy collapses. Degrees, titles, and gatekept expertise mean little when any teenager can summon expert-level prose and code. What will retain value is what AI cannot fake: a reputation built over years, hands that can build and heal and fix, the nerve to act when the model says "I am uncertain," and the character to say "I do not know" when everyone else has an AI-generated speech ready.
Humanity survives Mass Intelligence not by regulating it into submission or worshipping it as a god, but by refusing to be its ventriloquist dummy. If we treat AI as an oracle, we will deserve what we get: a world of articulate, confident, hollow people. If we treat it as a tool we must master — with friction, humility, and accountability — we might finally become what intelligence was always supposed to make us: wiser.